Comments on: A Strike on Strikes!

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:49:24 +0000

Man if Shaq saw this post it would be over for you Josh. No X’s on the big man please.

By: Buy Phentermine Online

Buy Phentermine Online — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:53:25 +0000

Hi, nice post. I couldn’t understand some parts of the article but it sounds interesting..
Continue writing…

By: idiot

idiot — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:10:40 +0000

Wow, we might be idiots, but at least we are nice.

If you’re so smart though… Why do you have to resort to name calling instead of giving a well reasoned argument?

By: Endre

Endre — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:01:39 +0000

Global Warming: I know you’re based in the states, and I know that the states are a place full off fucked up complete fucking IDIOTIC MORONS WITHOUT BRAINS, but I actually believed that the folks at Dreamhost was a bit above the mediocre norm of USA. Not so, apparently.

.. and you assholes have changed the TOS “under my feet” to not allow backups, now suddenly demanding lots of money per month for a service which, when I signed up with you, was free. The possibility to stick “random data” on the disk was an extremely nice feature, and the reason for several of your customers to come to you, including me.

I don’t like you anymore.

By: spearfish

spearfish — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:57:57 +0000

Haha. I agree, random. But funny!

By: Jeff @ DreamHost

Jeff @ DreamHost — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:09:41 +0000

> If instead we decide it was natural, we avoided a
> natural disaster. It’s what we call “win win”.

I’m not going to dispute to what percentage can be attributed to man vs. nature, but…

If it is mostly nature there really isn’t much that we can do (short of plugging volcanoes or constructing a gigantic sun-shade and placing it in low Earth orbit).

It seems possible/likely that at least some of the changes are exacerbated by human activity and we can make changes to mitigate that – but I’m not sure it’s a guaranteed win/win if the changes we make have little positive impact (and, given the associated economic costs, it could even turn out to be a losing proposition).

- Jeff @ DreamHost

By: Sibby

Sibby — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:06:47 +0000

So glad you mentioned NEO (Near Earth Object) research. I met a researcher who specializes in this stuff last year, at a party – and yes, it is really scary how poorly funded these scientists are.

Definitely as important as global warming and clean water, clean air, and removing all but the “quality” reality shows from TV.

By: vostorga

vostorga — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:41:11 +0000

A strike on down roundcube?

and this is not a joke

By: Grey Hodge

Grey Hodge — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:31:56 +0000

How about this; we set aside the arguments of WHAT us causing global climate change for now. Let’s just look at the fact that despite what’s posted here, we DO have a fairly good idea of some of the bad things that will happen with climate change. higher sea levels, more extreme weather, millions of people displaced, etc. This isn’t really debated to any great degree.

Let’s instead focus on what we can do, and DO it, then, LATER, when we’ve avoided a lot of the worst, THEN we can go back to arguing if it’s man made or not. If we then decide it’s man made, we fixed out problem. If instead we decide it was natural, we avoided a natural disaster. It’s what we call “win win”.

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:01:19 +0000

Heh. Like that tiny cell phone that you have in that one picture.

@Anonymous: You won’t get the attention of support by posting here.