Dealing With A DMCA Crook
March 15, 2007 on 1:14 pm | In Funnyish, Insider View, Musings, Rants by Jeff | 24 CommentsAlong with dealing with the various spammers and fraudsters who manage to find their way onto our servers, one of the issues we deal with pretty regularly is copyright infringement. People storing, distributing or downloading cracked computer games, purloined CD/DVD rips, etc. using their DreamHost accounts. These are usually pretty blatant, and our typical response is to just disable the associated accounts.
Yeah, we’re hardcore like that – kind of like Mounties.

Sometimes, though, there are ‘gray’ area cases where it’s not very clear whether or not copyright infringement is taking place – perhaps there’s a distribution license we don’t know about or it falls under Fair Use doctrine. Just because someone says that illegal copyright infringement is taking place does not make it so.
For that reason, we require what is known as a DMCA Notification. This is a legal document (submitted under penalty of perjury!) wherein the alleged copyright holder basically says “my stuff is being distributed without permission and I want it taken down!”, after which we take it down. A similar process exists for getting the content placed back online. It’s all a bit more complicated than this – and possible fodder for a future DreamHost weblog entry.
While the DMCA does offer some major benefits to both copyright holders and web hosts like DreamHost – legal immunity, woo-hoo! – it’s not always used as a force for good. Occasionally, unscrupulous types (and I’m looking at you, Church of Scientology!) will attempt to use the DMCA as a cudgel to take down sites that they don’t like, even when they are clearly in the legal right under copyright law. When that occurs – and it does from time to time – we tell them (in flowery legal language, of course) to go away and leave us alone.

Liability issues aside, we’re not about to knowingly help someone silence valid criticism by going along with false or overly broad DMCA Notifications.
Which brings us to the aptly-named Michael Crook…

Copyright © 2005, Fox News Network (not Michael Crook)
For those of you who are unaware, Michael Crook has become a bit of an Internet phenomenon – sort of like a twisted, distorted version of the Star Wars Kid. Instead of feeling pity because he once made a poor choice of getting in front of a camera, you can’t help but watch the slow motion trainwreck that ensues as he digs himself into a deeper and deeper hole.
It all started in 2005 when he was invited onto a Fox News Channel show due to his controversial “Forsake The Troops” web site. In a moment of spirited bipartisanship among the far-right and not-quite-as-far-right, the show’s hosts railed against him and his site, which was “dedicated to the notion that our nation’s military is grossly overcompensated, at the expense of the American taxpayers.” While also controversial, his holocaust denial site wasn’t featured.
You can view the segment in its entirety on Youtube.
Flash forward to September of last year: Crook decided to copy another “griefer” by posting fake ads promising sexual activity on Craig’s List, baiting men into writing and then posting those responses to his site. Popular weblog 10 Zen Monkeys found out about this and wrote an entry about it, including the (rather unfortunate, to put it mildly) screen capture from the Fox News appearance shown above. Crook responded by filing a DMCA Notification against the site’s web host, who quickly took it down.
The problem is that the copyright for the image – indeed, the whole video of the appearance – doesn’t belong to Michael Crook. It belongs to Fox News, who has stated they don’t care if it’s reposted. Somehow, Crook misinterpreted his being on the show as somehow making him a partial owner of the content.
The web and Crook’s reputation being what it is, the image spread like wildfire – eventually landing on a number of DreamHost-hosted sites. Humorous variations appeared all over the place (even in a FARK Photoshop contest), and Crook sent out fraudulent DMCA Notifications for each of them. We received several, though after the first was reinstated – and we learned the story behind Crook and the images – we stopped acquiescing to his goofy demands.
Once it became clear that we were done listening to him, Crook became quite agitated in his communication with us. He called us names, threatened legal action, filed Notification for yearbook photos he doesn’t own the rights to, filed Notifications for sites that we don’t even host, and even sent us these little gems:
While you’re duly noting, please note also that you will get a DMCA notice every day Until you comply.
You are now a party to interference with a business relationship as I have not received Royalties for these photographs, for which I paid a fee.
Also..just out of curiosity….how would your vendors and customers like an “anonymous” Tip that your company was founded and is run by child molestors?
Just wondering is all.
One other thing for your legal beagles to consider:
Those photographs were from a yearbook for which I paid. I am therefore the
copyright holder. You are fraudists, liars, and you probably all molest your children.
Umm. Yeah.
Mind you, DreamHost Abuse actually does incur a fair bit of this sort of thing. We’ve received death threats, bomb threats, you name it. Libel and defamation? Yeah, we get that sometimes too. Baseless legal threats, though, are a stupidly common occurrence (”I have a right to send spam under the First Amendment – I sue you!”). If we received a penny every time we heard this sort of bluster, we would… well… have a whole bunch of pennies. We don’t scare easy, though, so we mostly just laughed Crook’s Internet kookery off.
We couldn’t help but feel some glee, though, when Crook was sued by the Electronic Frontier Foundation for his abuse of the DMCA. Finally – a landmark case that we could point to showing the penalty for abusing the DMCA! Crook’s misuse of the law was so absuredly blatant that the EFF would almost certainly win!
Unfortunately, on Wednesday it was announced that the case was settled out of court. No legal precedent would be set. D’oh!
Almost as good, though, were the terms of the settlement. Crook would have to formally withdraw all DMCA complaints, apologize for his interference with the free speech rights of his targets, and – perhaps best of all – take a course in copyright law.
Here is Crook’s apology (nice touch with the mustache, huh?):
Of course, this is probably not all that sincere (Crook has since posted attacks against the EFF and 10 Zen Monkeys’ Jeff Diehl elsewhere), but at least it was an admission that he was – legally speaking – completely full of it.
There are a few things to learn from all this:
- If you don’t know the first thing about law, don’t file legal documents. You’d be surprised at how many invalid and incomplete DMCA Notifications we receive, even from people who probably do have a legitimate complaint. For your own sake, heed the advice of a qualified intellectual law attorney!
- If you don’t have a legitimate complaint, don’t make a point of harassing and annoying others. What begins as a minor deal that nobody will remember a week later can quickly become a bit of a tempest. Crook will live with his decisions for the rest of his life, and if (as he has said) he really has/had an interest in going into law he’s almost certainly ruined any chance for that.
- While it has its virtues, the DMCA is flawed. Formal penalties – ones involving more than just video-taped apologies – need to be codified in the law for those who file malicious or false Notifications.
- Simply appearing in a photo or on video does not give you copyright ownership over that appearance.
So, folks, for those keeping score at home: Do yourself a favor. Don’t be a Crook.
24 Responses to “Dealing With A DMCA Crook”
Powered by WordPress. Pool theme by Borja Fernandez, modified by DreamHost.
Like WordPress? Consider attending WordCamp LA.
Entries and comments feeds.
^Top^

March 15th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
Hey, Michael, Edgar Allen Poe called from beyond the grave and he wants his hair back. :D
March 15th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
What a loser, he apologized… haha…
March 15th, 2007 at 6:02 pm
Thanks for using discretion, DH. ^_^
March 15th, 2007 at 6:25 pm
Is it just me, or is that guy’s right eye — and eyebrow — higher up on his head than his left? Creepy.
March 15th, 2007 at 10:02 pm
Yup, I think his head’s a bit (actually, a lot) asymmetrical to the point of being, well, Crooked…
March 15th, 2007 at 10:24 pm
Just as reference: the worst DMCA abuses yet (and on a much more serious subject) were perpetrated by Diebold over the Internet release of about 13,000 internal EMails showing goofy and borderline criminal activity with voting machines. This was in the latter half of ‘03. EFF dealt with that one too, and Diebold ended up paying about $120,000 for false DMCA claims. I personally ended up filing a DMCA counter-notification under which I took on all legal liability for my site’s contents off of my ISP. I was the only site hit by a Diebold DMCA notice that had zero downtime. I’ve linked Diebold’s DMCA letter and my response.
March 15th, 2007 at 10:35 pm
I have a personal / family only website on Dreamhost and stumbled upon this article via digg. I was thinking of canceling since we don’t use it too much, however this stuff makes the service too good. You guys do a great job!!!
March 15th, 2007 at 11:14 pm
No wonder this ass-hat is so angry , it looks like his got beat with a ugly stick. I would be a negative mutha fucka to if I looked like that!
March 16th, 2007 at 12:01 am
I personally feel the guy has some sort of mental issue maybe a tumor, or serious head trauma. He is just to bizarre to take seriously.
March 16th, 2007 at 12:10 am
Such mustaches is one of those things that people don’t choose out of anything other than symbolism. Just like people don’t choose to name their kids “Adolf” these days out of anything other than symbolism.
Delusions or sheer ignorance I know not, but there’s a few screw loose, that’s for sure.
March 16th, 2007 at 12:19 am
I just signed up a client for a Dreamhost account today. My first one, hope there are many more to come. Dreamhost is the only hosting provider I know right now where I feel like I can trust y’all to do the right thing when bullshit like this happens. I think The Little Garden ( tlg.org : one of the first ISPs) was the last provider I’ve trusted when the man comes knocking.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:26 am
Wow if i looked like him i would slip on the soap while standing next to a cliff hoping that i fall over to my own death. What a total douche to appear on fox and say crap like that.
I have a idea, why doesnt get goto iraq and tell the troops that to their faces while signing a waiver of any harm that may come to him. The rule is, if you wont say it to someones face, then dont say it about them.
Speaking of his face, he was probably molested as a child by his uncle who breathes whisky breath down the back of his neck while grunting. Afterwards he was probably punched in the face until he passed out to avoid the shame.
March 16th, 2007 at 2:00 am
You guys are missing the point: this douchebag became famous by being an asshole, just like ann coulter. If he has any brains at all, he should be able to use this celebrity to make some money.
March 16th, 2007 at 2:42 am
Actually, if you have a photo taken of you here in Denmark, the one photographing needs to get permission to do it. But by granting that permission you throw away any claims for copyright, too.
Anyway, he was on Fox – I think he knew he would be publicized. ;)
March 16th, 2007 at 5:32 am
This guy is a complete loser, and a complete waste of skin. I’ve talked about him and his stance on the military a couple of times on my warblog. I don’t think anyone actually takes this loser seriously.
March 16th, 2007 at 6:03 am
I just recently caught up with this Internet meme. I read up on it and then found his video taped apology. I have to say it really is unfortunate that he has yet to find a suitable look for himself. His choices in hairstyle and facial hair only add to his “make fun of me” factor on the Internet.
Have your fun now, but I say we drop this subject like a bad habit next week. He is only gaining from our bashing right now. There’s no such thing as bad publicity.
March 16th, 2007 at 6:12 am
Oh thank you for your completely unbiased comment on FNC (!NOT) Do you ever watch? If you think it’s far right then that’s a problem with were you are on the political progress bar.
March 16th, 2007 at 7:07 am
[...] Dealing With A DMCA Crook – DreamHost Blog [...]
March 16th, 2007 at 8:09 am
[...] one of the largest Web hosting services, posted an entry to their blog yesterday discussing their handling of DMCA notices, in particular false [...]
March 16th, 2007 at 9:25 am
Despite the apology, he’s posted an off-the-record video of himself that shows he’s not learned his lesson, and he’s started yet another website of misinformation for it.
March 16th, 2007 at 5:26 pm
If the DMCA takedown notices have to be filed under penalty of perjury, then there is certainly the basis for a significant criminal prosecution of this twit. IANAL, and I can’t begin to understand the jurisdictional issues, but certainly some publicity hungry DA will want to take this guy on.
Having said that, it is pretty clear that this guy just wants attention. He takes controversial stands not because they come from deeply held beliefs, but because their very controversy will garner attention. Further action will just encourage him. The only hope is that if we can punish him criminally, then maybe it will discourage those whose abuse is financially driven rather that just grandstanding.
March 16th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
I wonder if he ever accidentally claimed the copyright to any pictures of Brian Peppers… they look like they could be related.
March 27th, 2007 at 8:06 pm
[...] Having had way too much experience with the negative aspects of the DMCA lately, I was pleasantly surprised to find an article at Plagiarism Today referencing DreamHost’s blog post on Dealing with a DMCA Crook. [...]
December 3rd, 2008 at 8:48 pm
[...] DreamHost, a web hosting service, detailed on their blog over a year ago a fun little experience of gross misuse of the DMCA by a malcontent named Michael Crook. I don’t want to steal their thunder since they have a great story to tell, so I recommend you read all about it here. [...]