Categories
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
9 Responses to “Router is upset.”



September 13th, 2005 at 2:32 pm
Having problems will mail coming through. It seems to be trickling but I’m wondering about mail that was received during the downtime. Is it in queue and can be expected to arrive, or… ??
(I just sent out multiple queries yesterday about vacation rentals and have gotten almost nothing back, when I should have gotten well over a hundred responses)
September 13th, 2005 at 2:41 pm
Latency seems higher but other than that it appears to be working fine for me.
PING willscorner.net (66.33.208.206): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=99.151 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=101.968 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=98.772 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=98.649 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=99.606 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=100.422 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=117.931 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=108.904 ms
64 bytes from 66.33.208.206: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=107.854 ms
I usually get about 80ms and I’m off the global crossing uplink. Otherwise everything else seems fine. Thank you btw for bringing dedicated machine up first. My client was really happy :-)
September 13th, 2005 at 2:43 pm
Basically one of our core routers started behaving a little strangely, getting a high load, and then its active supervisor (which is pretty much it’s CPU) died.
The backup supervisor came online and it’s still up and running, but we’re still seeing a high load and a little packet loss.
We’re doing traffic analysis to see just what the hell’s going on (while we work on a bunch of other leftover issues from yesterday).
September 13th, 2005 at 2:46 pm
wow. sounds like you kids are really earning your salaries this week. thanks for all your hard work in trying to keep all of our websites etc. running!
September 13th, 2005 at 2:49 pm
Have you had any reports of SMTP not working? I can receive email, but not send. And it keeps asking me for a password each time I try to send (inputing the correct password doesn’t help).
September 13th, 2005 at 3:21 pm
Maybe you guys are having another DOS attack.
That would be prefect wouldn’t it.
September 13th, 2005 at 4:22 pm
No, we’re seeing normal traffic on our uplinks. If it was that I’d be at home in bed by now.
We’re talking to Cisco. I’m on my 6th Red Bull today! Should be fixed soon. Or soonish!
September 13th, 2005 at 4:39 pm
My site has slowed down to a trickle =/ Thanks for all the hard work to fix things though! It is much appreciated! :)
December 16th, 2005 at 5:00 pm
Just wanted to wonder… Is everything OK now? No further DDOS’s or anything of the kind?
Regards